There was some pretty intense briefing activity going on at the World Trade Organisation in Geneva early this week as a delegation from the island government of held consultations with representatives from the European Commission, and , which are third parties to its Internet gaming discrimination case against the .  

Briefing sessions were also held with representatives from  Brazil, Barbados, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago.

The Antiguan team was led by Ambassador Dr. John Ashe and comprised legal counsel Mark Mendel and Elliott Paige, Minister Counselor, OECS Technical Mission to the WTO

"Now that both sides have filed their respective submissions to the WTO [dispute] panel that will hear our case against the US' claim that it is "in compliance" with the rulings and recommendations of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body, and with the October 23 deadline for submissions by third party Members of the WTO, these consultations with the third parties provide us with an important opportunity to address all aspects of our case," said the Honourable Dr. Errol Cort, who, in his capacity as Antigua's Minister of Finance and the Economy, has substantive responsibility for this issue.  

WTO Ambassador Dr. John Ashe echoed these sentiments when he noted that: "As one of the smallest WTO Members, economically and geographically speaking, my delegation is pleased with the ongoing interest and participation in this issue from two of the largest economic trading partners of the United States, namely Japan and the European Union."

Kaye MacDonald, Director of Gaming in Antigua, expressed her satisfaction with the involvement of third party WTO Members and praised their continued involvement in the uphill struggle against the United States. "Given the importance of the industry to our overall economy, we are pleased that the third parties, having examined the merits of our case, have decided to stay the course," she said.

"From the outset, the 's action in this case leaves a lot to be desired and recent Congressional actions have, in my view, further compounded the apparent disregard for the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism," said the delegation's Legal Adviser, Mark Mendel.

"Firstly, the ignored the rulings and recommendations of the DSU. Then they argued for more time to implement the same recommendations they were ignoring. And finally, after being given a total of eleven months and two days to implement these rulings and recommendations by a WTO Arbitrator, they arbitrarily concluded that they were 'in compliance' after all," he said.